Chapter 91 = Buyers Beware

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP Client Alert
6.12

Commercial real estate buyers are cautioned to update their due diligence checklists and their standard list of required seller representations following the New Jersey Tax Court’s recent decision in Yeshivat v. Borough of Paramus, in which an existing property owner’s real estate tax appeal was dismissed because the property’s prior owner failed to respond to a pre-closing request from the tax assessor for income and expense information.

In the Yeshivat matter, under a statute referred to as “Chapter 91,” the tax assessor sent a request for income and expense information to the owner of an income-producing property. The owner was given 45 days to respond. Six days after the request was sent, however, ownership of the property was transferred to a new owner, the plaintiff. Following the closing, the property ceased to be income-producing because the new owner was occupying the property.

Neither the prior owner nor the new owner responded to the Chapter 91 request. When the new owner subsequently filed a tax appeal, the municipality moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to respond to the request.

The new owner opposed the motion, arguing that dismissal was not appropriate for a number of reasons: the property was now owner-occupied; the Chapter 91 request had been sent only to the prior owner, and; the new owner was unable to comply with the tax assessor’s request because the information was requested for a time period prior to the closing.

The Tax Court held that the failure of the prior owner to respond to a valid Chapter 91 request for income-producing property was a defect that ‘runs with the land’ and therefore barred the tax appeal of the subsequent owner. The Tax Court refused to impose an obligation on the tax assessor to investigate all property transfers and then send a Chapter 91 request to subsequent owners. To the contrary, the Tax Court found that the property purchaser had an obligation to inquire about the assessment status to preserve its right to appeal.

For those purchasing commercial properties, following the Tax Court’s advice concerning the nature and extent of pre-closing inquiry will avoid post-closing surprises in a subsequent tax appeal. In order to protect against the result in the Yeshivat case, purchasers of income-producing property should take the following actions: 

For additional information on property tax appeals or Chapter 91 requests, please contact the author of this Alert:

Thomas J. Denitzio
Co-Chair, Real Estate Department
TDenitzio@greenbaumlaw.com

Attorneys