Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP Client Alert
1.17

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published the final Hazardous Waste Generator Improvements Rule, which amends hazardous waste regulations under the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The final version, published in November 2016, is largely the same as the version EPA proposed in August, with only a handful of minor changes.  According to EPA, its “primary intent … is to foster improved compliance by hazardous waste generators in the identification and management of the hazardous waste they generate and, as a result, improve protection of human health and the environment.” 

One flaw perceived by EPA in its regulatory scheme for RCRA was that the requirements relating to generators were not consolidated in one chapter, making it harder for generators to fully grasp the scheme. Accordingly, the main focus of the Generator Improvements Rule is to consolidate the existing regulations applicable to generators into Part 262 of the RCRA regulations. In addition to this ostensibly neutral reorganization, the Generator Improvements Rule provides a mixed bag of substantive changes that modestly increase a generator’s flexibility in some areas, but notably increase potential penalty exposure, regulatory burdens, and restrictions in others.

EPA advises that most of the changes implemented by the Generator Improvements Rule do not affect the substantive meaning of the regulations. However, there are enough wording “improvements,” “clarifications of existing meaning,” and enhancement of existing requirements mixed among the existing regulatory language that the entire reworked regulatory scheme mandates careful consideration by all generators, whether novice or seasoned.  

An Up-Close Look at the Changes

Three of EPA’s substantive changes to the generator requirements should provide generators with new flexibility when complying with RCRA:

The Generator Improvements Rule allows a generator claiming the status of a “Very Small Quantity Generator” (EPA’s new name for Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator) or a Small Quantity Generator to maintain that status even if it has one event in a year that would otherwise bump the generator into a more stringent regulatory status. The flexibility allowed by this change, however, is tightly conscribed. Only one such event is allowed per year except that a second event may be allowed if a waiver is obtained from EPA.  Also, there are new agency-notification and recordkeeping requirements.  A Very Small Quantity Generator must obtain an EPA ID number if it wants to take advantage of this provision. Not surprisingly, a generator must become familiar with the regulatory details and plan its waste management activities carefully in order to safely benefit from this new flexibility.

This new flexibility is also tightly conscribed. It is not available to small retailers that do not own multiple stores. It is not available to Small Quantity Generators. There are advance notification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. When shipped to the Large Quantity Generator, the wastes must be labeled as “Hazardous Waste” with an indication of the hazards presented.

With the exception of these three potentially beneficial, but tightly conscribed, provisions, the Generator Improvements Rule either increases the degree of burden and restrictiveness imposed on generators or is neutral. The most significant potential adverse impact for generators is the new language that divides all requirements into two categories: “Condition for Exemption” and “Independent Requirement.”

The enforcement consequence of a violation of an Independent Requirement is what is normally expected—a penalty or other enforcement action appropriate for that particular violation. For example, the penalty for an error in a manifest would be limited to that appropriate for a single violation of the manifest requirement. A generator violating a Condition for Exemption, however, is not only subject to penalties for that violation, but also hundreds of theoretical violations that accrue due to an instantaneous forfeiture of the exemption.

The reason offered by EPA for treating violations of a Condition for Exemption differently is that it views the three generator categories to be exemptions from a general requirement to obtain a treatment, storage, and disposal permit allowing the management of hazardous waste onsite.  EPA created these exemptions at the very beginning of RCRA because obtaining and maintaining a treatment, storage, and disposal permit is a very significant burden that is inappropriate for generators that only manage waste temporarily onsite pending offsite shipment for disposal.

A significant problem with EPA’s approach is that its definition of Conditions for Exemption is over-inclusive. The main criteria determining eligibility for the three generator categories are the time limits imposed on storage of hazardous waste prior to shipment for offsite disposal and the quantity limits on the amount of wastes that can be generated per month by Small Quantity Generators and Very Small Quantity Generators. In addition to these, RCRA specifies many requirements that generators in each generator category must undertake in order to maintain compliance. The definition of Conditions for Exemption incorporates not only the eligibility criteria but also all of the requirements that apply once a generator is in a particular category.

As a result, a generator’s “exemption” would also be forfeited by any of the following mistakes, even when there is a good faith effort to comply:

EPA describes the new “condition for exemption” enforcement scheme as a mere “clarification” of the existing law rather than the promulgation of something new. This statement may be true with respect to violations of storage time and monthly generation quantity limits, but runs contrary to the way agencies and industries have routinely enforced other generator-related requirements now deemed to be conditions for exemption. In the preamble, EPA advises that the new language is not intended to “signal a change” in how it enforces the regulations “in the great majority of enforcement efforts,” so hopefully the agency will not be pursuing the draconian penalties allowed by the new language for minor infractions.  

In addition to the enforcement consequences of the “condition for exemption” change, the Generator Improvements Rule increases the burdens and restrictions imposed on retailers and other generators in a number of ways, including:

Next Steps

The Generator Improvements Rule is scheduled to become effective on May 30, 2017 in states where EPA directly administers the RCRA program. Although EPA delegates responsibility for RCRA in New Jersey to the Department of Environmental Protection, the amendment should become effective in New Jersey on May 30, 2017, as New Jersey automatically adopts EPA amendments to RCRA regulations. Other states with delegated responsibility for RCRA have until July 2018 or July 2019 to adopt the new requirements. The longer grace period is allowed for states in which an amendment of a statute is required.

Please contact the author of this Alert, Daniel Flynn, for any questions regarding the issues discussed in this Alert or compliance with RCRA in general.

Attorneys